Finale Movie -- SPOILERS

For one.... the smell of a flower will make anyone do something he/she would never ever otherwise do(such as blowing up children). Well, shoot, look out for ugly men baring flowers!

Two... the link to Grissom was pure tripe. Honestly, I laughed my way through the entire plotline. Not even a crispy fried Heather could have saved it for me.

Believe me,I started watching more Peyton Manning and the Broncos and less of this dreck.

So, tell me, did Grissom and Greg ever even talk? To me, that was inexcusable. Instead we got mindless prattle with Catherine's daughter.

I also didn't like the Grissom and Sara ending(and I'm a huge fan of the couple) It was stupid and didn't clarify ANYTHING. In fact, from what I saw, Grissom and Sara barely talked.

I give the whole finale a big fat F.
 
Incidentally, yrs ago, I was banned from this board for making a post about Jorja's sexual orientation.

I didn't really care though because CSI went down the tubes fast when Grissom left.

Hated both Laurence Fishburne and Ted Danson in the role.

Frankly, Danson looked like a serial killer that the lab needed to catch.

I will always be a fan of Jorja's. I thi
 
Incidentally, yrs and yrs ago I got banned from this site for making a comment about Jorja's sexual orientation.

I didn't care, however, because CSI went down the tubes fast after Grissom left.

I absolutely hated Laurence Fishburne and Ted Danson in the role. Danson, in fact, looked like a serial killer that the lab needed to catch.

As for Jorja, I will always love her. Totally believable as a forensic scientist, and she seems like such a lovely, kind human being.

A shout out to Jorja Rain.

As for Desertwind, I hope you're still not in denial.

I'm quite sure I will now be banned. So, if I don't respond, you know why.
 
Please don't use the "goon" term either. It was Sea Shepherd I think, not agree peace but their cause is a good one and they aren't crazy. Not saying it fits in the story context, I'm still undecided, just that we shouldn't be disrespectful. I'm not going to start up a debate, this is definitely not the place, just hate to see people disrespect others.
 
Going to post what I said in the other thread.

Nah, didn't care for it.

I don't go around San Diego Harbor but not sure if San Diego has any rocks like they showed and I don't think there is any mountains over the sea.

I think George realized this wasn't going to be a good movie for him and wisely sat out.

I don't get why Catherine's daughter would think Grissom would remember her after so long and I think Catherine could have said, you don't remember her? She's my daughter instead of my vagina.

I already deleted it, I seem to remember at the beginning the bomber being alone and no one around him when he went up to the lady. Then when they show the video, there was another woman there.

EDIT: I forgot to mention, when Grissom went to the lab, no one talked to him for minutes but in the Vegas crossover, when Mac went to visit the lab in Vegas, Mac got stopped by I forgot his name already.
 
Thanks for your post, Drea, you made interesting points. Sorry to hear you were banned. I personally don't see anything wrong with your post, but if the site's rules don't allow such discussions then we have to accept them or post on a different site.

I thought the same about the flowers and as soon as children showed up I knew the bomb wouldn't go off near them; children are never harmed on such shows.

Grissom talked more with Ecklie than Brass and Greg combined, which was a shame. It was probably due to lack of time.
 
The plot had a lot of promise. A wave of bombings inspired or instigated by Lady Heather. Grissom and Catherine have to come back to help out. In the main I was finding the plot to be quite gripping but it petered out with a whimper. Once they showed the gallery of faces and amongst them was Eugene Tooms I felt for sure he was the one and it was too obvious (more obvious than normal). In the end his motives were weak. I didn't quite get the bee angle and how it got human dna on it, I need to see that again. The absence of Nick was a bit of a let down and in addition the relationship between Sara and Grissom was never a big deal that I particularly enjoyed. I was really looking forward to how Greg would react when he met him again, but it never happened and instead focused on Catherine's daughter, which I found strange.

It was so good to see Grissom back. I disagree with previous posts as I thought that Langston and DB were good characters and added something different to the show, I enjoyed them. But there's not denying that Gil made CSI for me. I realise that now. His methods and his quirks were always interesting.

I'm glad the show got a proper ending, clearly not quite everything was resolved and tied in a neat bow to everyone's tastes and some stuff was quickly skipped over. Overall I enjoyed it, but it wasn't great though.

CSI has been part of my life for 15 years now, it seems strange to think it's come to end. But that original line up of Gil, Catherine, Nick, Warrick, Sara, Brass and Greg is the classic line up and it was a fantastic gripping show for a long while.
 
Last edited:
It was so good to see Grissom back. I disagree with previous posts as I thought that Langston and DB were good characters and added something different to the show, I enjoyed them. But there's not denying that Gil made CSI for me. I realise that now. His methods and his quirks were always interesting.
I agree with you on all counts. I thought Ray and DB were both good characters, showing so much promise early on and well played by their respective actors ... but ultimately let down by the writing. The same was true, on a lesser level, for William Petersen's Grissom, who is such a remarkable lead character in the pantheon of great television characters. But even for Grissom, the writing of his exit story was not up to the level of the writing in the earlier years of the series (but it still was nowhere as bad as it got for either Ray or DB). I just think that ultimately, the people creating stories for TV shows run out of ideas, so then they feel pressured to resort to the same tired dramatic cliches that have kept network television afloat, more or less, for years. The creative team behind "CSI" ran out of good ideas. But what a stellar run the show had up to that point. At least we will always have that.
 
I must say that Langston and DB gave something different to the show, of course for one is good for another not but I liked this change. I saw many not good opinions about finale here and in forum in Poland and I agree, but I think CBS is one who gave only two hour (without ads 86 minutes). Of course they could gave a six episodes or gave nothing. But it's a really bitter-sweet ending.
 
I think the idea behind Catherine's daughter was to indicate that there would be another generation of CSI. Like coming full circle.
 
I think the idea behind Catherine's daughter was to indicate that there would be another generation of CSI. Like coming full circle.

Yeah, I wonder if they'll do another spinoff and/or reboot the show in a number of years.
 
It's not hard to imagine CBS trying for a reboot in a few years (especially if they're desperate for a hit) ... but I hope they don't. I just don't think they can recapture the magic of those great early years.

For me, the first four years were the best. Season 5 was still good, but took on a voyeuristic tone that I felt the previous seasons did not have. And then I liked the "Miniature Killer" episodes up until they revealed the killer and her motive. (I've never been crazy about the "CSI in danger" episodes.) But even after all of that, and Grissom's departure, there were still good episodes. The series didn't fall apart, IMO, until Season 12, when the writing and special effects became rather pedestrian. But there were so many amazing episodes up until that point. I feel badly for the cast and crew of Season 12 on that they weren't given the same great material to work with.
 
I don't think this has been posted.

CSI’ Series Finale: Creator Anthony Zuiker On That Ending, Deleted Scene And The Future For The Characters & Himself

Tonight CBS bid farewell to its most important drama series of the past two decades. How CSI came to be has become part of network lore — Anthony Zuiker going from a Las Vegas tram driver to creator of the biggest show in the world, CBS’ Nina Tassler getting a pleading last minute call from then ABC Studios-based Jerry Bruckheimer TV to hear the pitch after ABC (and others) had passed, CBS debating between CSI and a Tony Danza pilot when Everybody Loves Raymond’s Phil Rosenthal gives a vote to the forensic drama, and ABC Studios pulling out of what would become a $1 billion franchise. CSI was the last big network hit to start on Friday before it helped CBS become the first network to challenge NBC’s then-impenetrable Thursday lineup in a big way. CSI went to become the most watched series in the US and around the world, lasting 15 seasons and spawning three spinoffs while going through three leading men and two leading ladies.

csiTonight, original stars William Petersen and Marg Helgenberger returned for the finale, which saw the old gang get back together for one last case involving a Vegas casino blast and popular recurring character Lady Heather (Melinda Clarke). In the end, Ted Danson’s DB Russell took off for Quantico to join CSI: Cyber and fan-favorite couple Gill Grissom (Petersen) and Sara Sidle (Jorja Fox) set sail together. In an interview with Deadline, CSI creator Anthony Zuiker, who wrote the two-hour closer, talks about the finale’s love triangle story, which he initially rejected, and a cut scene that would confirm Catherine’s (Helgenberger) new job, reveals where all main characters would be in 10 years and shares his own plans for the near future that may surprise you (They do not involve television).

DEADLINE: Let’s start with the final scene of Gil and Sara sailing off into the sunset. How did that ending come about?

ZUIKER: Sixteen years ago, William Petersen, (executive producers) Cindy Chvatal and Jonathan Littman and myself sat down at the Beverly Wilshire, that was the first time we got together. We actually met there 16 years later, same table, same party of four. And William Peterson pulled out this research folder that dealt with sea shepherd. This is a gentleman that goes along the ocean and does things in terms of keeping the ocean safe. That was the beginning of me thinking of the Gil Grissom’s character being a CSI at sea. We knew we wanted to start with him on a boat. Then we started to think about ending with him on the boat. And it just organically happened. Once he’d gotten in touch with his heart and when he really understood that Sara was the only person for him, it was only fitting as a closure for the series that Gil Grissom and Sara Sidle would drive off into the sunset.

DEADLINE: Was there any alternative ending you’d considered?

ZUIKER: No, there wasn’t. We knew right away that if we were going to grab (Gil) on a boat to start his arc it only was fitting to end there. The one thing that wasn’t planned, it hit me during the running, was them actually driving off into the sunset, only this time it was on water. The metaphor of them driving off into the sunset happened in the moment.

DEADLINE: The Gil-Sara romance has been a very popular storyline for many seasons but also divided some fans. Why did you make it the centerpiece of the finale? Did you always know that the two of them would end up together or you did it for the fans?

Sara_GrissomZUIKER: This one really was for the fans. I’d put some feelers out early on Twitter about what were some things the hardcore Twitttersphere wanted to accomplish. And overwhelmingly it really was a sufficient closure between Grissom and Sara. We knew that we would be going that route. We had to complicate that fantasy, and that was the reason to put Lady Heather in the middle because she suddenly became this other option that Grissom had been wrangling with over the course of many seasons, much to the point where a lot of the audience was convinced, and maybe even Grissom himself, that Lady Heather is the one that actually has his heart. As it turns out, Grissom has to make a choice by the end of the show, and I think the audience would be happy he chooses Sara and we finally put them together.

DEADLINE: If I’m not mistaken, the most recent episode of CSI you wrote before the finale was a 2011 one featuring Lady Heather. Why was she picked for such a key part in the movie, turning it into a love triangle story?

heatherZUIKER: I had the early idea to put a detonations up and blow up a casino, I thought that was something different. I believe the Bruckheimer camp had the idea about Lady Heather. At first my response was I rejected that idea. Then I began to think about it — she was in six or seven episodes, and she was so instrumental in Grissom’s life. And once it became clear to me that she was the obstacle to prevent Grissom and Sara from being together and that, because of her background and intelligence level, she had the ability to be the primary suspect in the investigation and also be the primary obstacle in Grissom’s love, that just felt right as a story that can carry over the course of 2 hours.

DEADLINE: What happens to Catherine? Does she get the Lab Director job with Sara gone?

ZUIKER: We had a scene that we cut for time where Catherine was walking with her daughter Lindsey down the hallway at the end of the shift and the sheriff runs up and says, ‘Sara wanted you to have this’ and hands Sara’s badge to Catherine, which would let everybody know that she gave the job up so Catherine could run the lab. We had that scene and we cut it. We felt like, once Catherine told DB Russell that she was thinking about putting her hat in the ring and once we saw Sara actually commit to be with Grissom on the boat and drive off, audience would put two and two together that Catherine would be the one to run the lab happily ever after.

DEADLINE: Was there any CSI actor you wanted for the finale and couldn’t get?

ZUIKER: No.

DEADLINE: If there is a CSI: 10 Years Later special a decade from now, where will we see the main characters? Will Gil and Sara still be roaming the seas?

ZUIKER: I believe so. I believe in my heart 10 years from now that Grissom and Sara not only are conquering the seas and sailing the oceans but they are also probably saving the environment on land and sea. They would probably have children and they would dedicate their lives to the betterment of humanity. In terms of the other characters, probably Catherine would still be running the crime lab, Bass probably would retire, living somewhere in Hawaii, and DB probably is working in the private sector in Washington DC. And I think that all these characters would still have their toe in the crime water.

DEADLINE: Will we see anyone from the CSI Vegas team stop by CSI Cyber to say hi to DB and Avery?

ZUIKER: Not for the foreseeable future. The one person obviously going to CSI Cyber is Ted Danson’s character DB Russell. I’m personally extremely happy about that transition, I believe that the loyal viewers of Las Vegas would want to sample CSI Cyber because of his transfer. And I think that the CSI family is a family, so if there is ever an opportunity on Cyber for any actor who is still living on the show to stop by, that might be a nice treat.

DEADLINE: How was writing the finale similar and different from writing the pilot 15 years ago?

ZUIKER: When I was writing the pilot, I wasn’t really aware of the success of the show; the mandate was to break every rule in television, write something visceral and have a new take on crime drama. And of course put in the forensic science that people didn’t know about in 2000. In 2015, we did the opposite – there was far more character, we went to some old-school, regular science, and it was much easier in my opinion than the pilot because, although I wrote the pilot in 3 days and wrote the two-hour (finale) in 7 days, the characters were well established, the voices were clear, the actors were back, so I felt like I was a typist.

DEADLINE: What is next for you?

ZUIKER: For me, what excites me about the business is telling stories. CSI was fortunate enough to tell global stories for procedurals and scripted programming. So the next venture for me is taking on a childhood fantasy of mine, which is to write a musical for Broadway. (Zuiker later revealed that will be Soul Train The Musical). As an only child living in Las Vegas I used to play records, act out roles in my living room with a wooden spoon and pretend I was all the characters. Nothing in my opinion is greater than live theater, and I love nothing more than music, so I look forward to trying to bring a new level of storytelling to the world in terms of the venue of Broadway.

I hope they include those deleted scenes on the DVD. Maybe add them in the movie altogether.
 
Back
Top