Were The Producers Serious?

CSI Files

Captain
Some writers are wondering if the producers really wanted to avoid the strike.

In the weeks leading up to the writers' strike, <font color=yellow>Carol Mendelsohn</font>, co-creator and executive producer for CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, was one of the members of the Writers Guild of America (WGA) negotiating committee. "The writers wanted to make a deal and were willing to negotiate until there was a deal," she told Hollywood Today, "but the other side never made us an offer, never put an economic package on the table, so here we are on the picket line."

Some members of the WGA felt that the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) were not serious during the negotiations. "I observed some behavior during the negotiations that clearly indicated to me that there was some gamesmanship going on from the other side," said Desperate Housewives executive producer, creator and showrunner <font color=yellow>Marc Cherry</font>. "They (the producers) didn't get into serious discussions until the day before we said we were going to strike, which was a really bad sign to me. And the truth is we went in last July very kind of honestly and earnestly saying here are our proposals. And they didn’t start discussing them with us until the last possible second. I was very concerned about that. And I do think the fact that they had their press release prepared (when talks ended abruptly last Sunday) prior to us even discussing things was a really bad sign." Another writer told the LA Times that "[t]he studios are using the strike to clean their books, getting rid of the writers they don't want and keeping the ones they do."

"The writers aren't trying to win anything," Mendelsohn said. "The writers are just trying not to lose what they already have. If management takes away all the money they want to take away now, next time they are going to come after our pension and health benefits. So this is an issue that affects unions and guilds everywhere. This is a moment the writers happen to be on the front line." CSI star <font color=yellow>William Petersen</font> joined the writers on the picket line, pointing out that "without them I have no show to do, so we're gonna be out of work." Petersen wasn't the only actor to show his support of the writers. Entertainment Tonight did a segment showing stars on the picket line, including <font color=yellow>Robin Williams</font>. "We can't work without them, [and] they can't work without us," Williams said. It has been reported that former President <font color=yellow>Bill Clinton</font> has offered to mediate negotiations between the WGA and the AMPTP.

The original article about the writers pondering the producers' real intentions is from Hollywood Today. A small video segment of the Entertainment Tonight report can be watched on ET Online. Thanks to <font color=yellow>LaurenPetersen</font> from Your Tax Dollars At Work.<center></center>
 
It's interesting to read the issues from another perspective, although my first thoughts on it included the word 'propaganda'. :lol:

I would be surprised if the producers didn't have a press release ready for the talks breaking down! Are we supposed to believe that the writers guild were equally unprepared for the outcome? They certainly had enough placards and leaflets pre-printed... :p

In an ideal world they will all sit down and start talking, but I found it interesting to read that these things may well wait until the SAG start joining in some time in the new year, sad but I could see that happening. And Robin Williams sums that up really with 'We can't work without them, they can't work without us.' :rolleyes:

The article also mentioned that CBS Radford has been almost a ghost town since the start of the strike, isn't that where NY is filmed?
 
^It is, and a bunch of other scripted shows. I know it's one of the studios the writers are picketing as well.
 
AFAIK, SAG contracts aren't up until midway through the year - May or June. If the strike isn't resolved by then, it'll mess up the 2008/09 season as well as this season.

Scripted shows are going to run out probably by January. Which means no new shows for February sweeps, which means crappy ratings and lower ad rates.
But to get shows on the air by February, they'd really have to get a settlement early in the new year to give them enough lead time.

This whole thing is a complete mess. :-(
 
idk what to think about it. if this situation that we have right now has been purposeful by one side of the conflict, it certainly makes little sense.

one thing that comes to my mind is publicity, but who would jeopardize ALL TV shows for some buzz?

but let's face the facts. for the past two years the ratings of all TV shows have been declining. no exceptions. people are watching less TV, using TiVo, DVR's or Innertube (which commercially equals not watching the shows at all b/c they avoid commercial breaks. with the exception of Innertube, but it does not have a large share anyway).

maybe the producers saw a perfect opportunity to boost the ratings of all shows by sending a message to public - "There may not be any shows at all soon. Watch what's left cuz it may be the last time you'll have a chance to."
They certainly had enough placards and leaflets pre-printed...
well, i think if they were taking this strike seriously they had to be ready for every situation. nobody would take them seriously if they were just threatening without any real coverage.
 
Back
Top