Here is a hypothetical situation. There has been a murder in the area where you live and eventually they apprehend the suspect. Charges are pressed and eventually you are selected to be a juror in this case. One lawyer decides to use a forensic animation (like they do in the CSI shows) to recreate the crime and present his facts. The other side has decided to stick with more traditional photos and sketches. Does the fact that a forensic animation was presented by the one lawyer give him more credibility in your opinion?