Michael Jackson: Guilty or innocent?

Lia

Lab Technician
I want to know what you guys think.

I'm probably the minority, but I think he's innocent. I think people took advantage of his love for children just to make an interesting headline, y'know? He has a sort of Peter Pan complex, so I seriously doubt he's gay OR straight. A PPC is that you never want to/will grow up, and children don't usually have a sexual orientation or any sort of interest in sex, right? I'd be more willing to believe that he is asexual.
 
I somewhat agree with that, but I just think he really is guilty, but the testomony from the children he 'molested' wasn't believable for me :confused: so I guess that makes me confused
 
I'm a little bit on the fence with this because he could of done all those things he's being accused of however, different people could take advantage of this and say some crap like "He molested me" when he doesn't even know them or has ever seen them. So really he could be guilty AND innocent.

It kind of reminds me of a witch hunt because first you've got one person saying it then you've got the whole neighbourhood saying it.
 
that guy freaks me out, innocent or guilty, whatever, he is sick :p if someone ask me what kind of creature scare me
Vampire, Zombie, Demon..no .. Michael Jackson :lol:
 
I am on neither side because anyone is capable of this and him being a musician does not eliminate 'molesting' as something that he would do.
 
CaptainMiracle51 said:
Innocent or guilty, I still think he's insane. Remember the baby-dangling incident?
*shudders* Jeez, that poor child being dangled from a building with some sort of napkin on his head. :eek: I really feel sorry his children, wearing masks everywhere they go - it's really not good!

Anyway, do I think he is guilty? It's pretty hard to judge only going by what you hear in the media, but I don't think his guilty. I personally think he wouldn't have the mind frame to do some thing like that, I think his too childlike himself. I do however think his off his trolley and to put it politely 'a sandwich sort of a picnic'.

Saying that, it's very true that the person you least expect could be capable of almost anything (that's the CSI side of my brain working :lol:).
 
I dont think he is guilty because if he was, he would TRY to cover up the scandal but he is not trying to cover it up.

He has invited many many celebrities to his land, even shared beds with celebrities with children so if he was guilty, why would he even try to invite celebrities to his manor because we know that many celebrities tell the media everything. Why would he take the risk?

Besides he's too weird/childlike to think of such a thingm to be honest. :rolleyes:
 
I think he's guilty, he should have been convicted, but the accuser's parent's shady schemes which wewre similar to this allegation, tarnsihed the accuser's credibility.

Can I ask why do even have this topic since the verdict was over a year ago?
 
Even it was a year ago, why cannot people discuss about it?

People talk about CSI season 1 even it was years ago ;)
 
Being a long-time Micheal Jackson fan, I'd say he's innocent. Why can't people just let him be? He is, after all, a human being and human beings make mistakes.
 
Back
Top