Hey there -- I'm new to this forum (hello!) but I thought this would be a brilliant - if somewhat controversial -"first" post. I found this great article on the gross exaggerations fuelling what people call the CSI effect over on one of my favourite forensic science websites... would love to hear what everyone thinks! http://forensicoutreach.com/the-csi-effect-6-reasons-why-tv-crime-shows-are-patently-absurd/ :lol:
i know all of that because i writte police comics strip, is know that the writters of the 3 show takes his lycenses when they writte one episode but i will say you to see the firts episodes of CSI Las Vegas, where was 3 detectives, the CSI Team that was a middle point between a detective and a forensic, the forensic guys, the cops officers (akers and mitchell and others) and finally the morgue girl. That was the way that csi works in the firts seasons, was a really real show, where every team take a different case, where was more of two deads or a serial killer, the firts episode was grissom againts a serial killer. Now the thing has change because now the writters do some turns so extrange and simple like the last episodes in this season.