'CSI' Receives Criticism For Portrayal Of Gay Killers

CSI Files

Captain
The website After Ellen, recently ran a piece analyzing CSI's use of homosexual and transgender murderers, and their sometimes stereotypical depiction of said characters.

Website writer <font color=yellow>Miranda Lo</font> argued that while CSI has come a long way in accurately portraying robbers and murderers, it still resorts to negative stereotypes when a homosexual killer is involved. "CSI still routinely depicts LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender) characters driven to kill due to their sexuality," Lo wrote. "They are desperate to hide their sexual orientation, psychotically jealous of their lovers, or criminally insane due to gender dysphoria. These representations call to mind the negative stereotypes that pervaded crime dramas in the 1970s and 1980s, when criminals who were gay killed because of their sexuality."

But Lo also makes mention of CSI's good efforts. The show's depiction of LBGT criminals has improved since the organization GLADD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation) criticized the episode "Identity Crisis". In the episode, it is revealed recurrent suspect Paul Millander is a transgender, and therein laid the motive for his violent nature. “To have the second female-to-male character presented as a vicious, matricidal serial killer is profoundly disturbing and deeply offensive,” a representative for the organization said soon after the episode aired.

Though CSI's portrayal of homosexual and transgender killers has improved, Lo maintains there is room for more improvement. "The only way that CSI can truly move beyond these limiting and harmful stereotypes is to include openly gay characters who have nothing to do with the crime," she wrote. "Given that CSI is routinely the number one show on television, that would be a giant step forward, indeed."

To read the original article, visit AfterEllen.com.<center></center>
 
i hear you... plus... i don't think that it's that bad... i mean.. a lot of the characters that are murderers on the show are white males... so should they be getting angry too???... it's just a television show... they should complain about the way they are presented in the REAL news instead...
 
Look... I concour that discrimination based on sexual orientation is an ugly, ugly thing. But CSI has come such a long way since then! Why complain now? Miranda Lo cites several limited examples of "discrimination" on CSI. I wish to counter that. Consider the quotes of Gil Grissom in the 8th episode of Season 5; the one called "Ch-ch-changes":

"People confuse your obsession with sexuality as an obsession with sex.
"Amoebas at the start were not complex. But then they tore themselves apart and started sex."
"I'm actually not interested in your ass. But the person we're looking is a human butcher who might be."

And my personal favourite:

"Show them an oyster... There are two types of male oysters, and one of them can change genders at will... and before man crawled out of the muck, maybe he had the same opttion... maybe originally, we were supposed to be able to swtich genders, and being born with just one sex is a mutation."

Grissom shows an air of utmost respect to transgenders and shows no predjudice towards them.

The show has come a long way since the first two seasons. Let's be appreciative that CSI has seen a problem and has done their best to correct it. Furthermore, everyone of any creed is portrayed as murderer/killer/criminal on CSI. African-Americans, whites, Latinos, Asians. Anyone and everyone is "fair game"! Afterall, crime knows no gender, age, race, creed or even sexual orientation. If we took this article seriously, then we would have to write about CSI and it's problems portraying the image of blacks, whites, asians and whatever.

Look, things have improved... Move on will ya?

~Super Sweet Guy :D
 
Back
Top