Search results

Hence your reply. Tell me, since you're clearly gifted with nerves of steel and the ability to see a terrifying situation from all angles, what should she have done? As you pointed out, Grossman was a horny lech who wasn't going to take no for an answer. We can agree that she never should...

I question it because I find it repugnant. But thank you for admitting you're a misanthrope and possible sociopath.

^That tends to be a consequence of chronic headdesking. That logic string makes my head hurt, too.

So, let me see if I have this right: 1. Grossman was a horny lech who wouldn't have fired her because he fully intended to sexually exploit her regardless of her answer to his proposal. In other words, you acknowledge that he fully intended to rape her. 2. But it's gross because she opted...

Yes, because no woman has ever been exploited or sexually coerced by an authority figure, and everyone knows that once a woman gives consent to the sexual act, no matter how grudgingly, she loses the right to retract that consent or refuse further exploitation.:rolleyes::rolleyes: She put...

Ah, the misanthropic emo argument has reared its head. ~gets out her Stradivarius formed from the tears of the tragically misunderstood. Rosins bow with lack of give a damn.~

It isn't, but to sit in judgment the abused and claim that people who are routinely in fear for their lives should trust in a flawed system that routinely fails them and allows them to be further brutalized and take the high road is ridiculously sheltered and idealistic. Ideally, the law would...

Yes, because telling people always fixes everything, and no abusers get off on technicalities or with light sentences that give them more opportunities to terrorize and abuse their prey. There are too many people who have trusted the system and died for it.

Propaganda? Really? Because they've had two shows in ten years about an abused individual killing their abuser? In an ideal world, no abused person would feel so trapped as to see no other choice but to kill their abuser, but this world is not ideal, and people who are pushed too far...

I think the speculation about cancellation is so much alarmist hysteria. If it were on its last legs, then why bother replacing Melina with a high-caliber actress like Sela Ward? Are the ratings in decline? Yes, but a move to the Friday death slot and four mediocre seasons are bound to take a...

Yes, well, we see what happens when drawing the "right" set of eyeballs to the TV becomes the sole concern. Ashley Simpson, Nelly Furtado, DL drama, Kim Kardashian. If S7 and quality actors like John Larroquette are old-fogey television, then give me my cane and that jar of Pepsodent.

"No cop fails to report his missing weapon." Oh, really, Mac? How soon we forget Danny's failure to report the theft of his service weapon by Rikki Sandoval and his even more egregious failure to report the theft of his badge for months while it was in the hands of a deranged serial...

Oh, Flack, I still love you so, even if you did have a serious case of 'shroom hair going on last night. Your scene with Danny in Central Park was pure gold, and I wholeheartedly sympathize with your fear of spiders, the nasty little beasties. I do, however, think you've been watching too...

He called Belson an ex-cop, not an ex-con. If he'd been an ex-con, Danny wouldn't have wanted him to call him when he got out or been surprised that he killed three people and abetted in two more murders.

And Belson is still not old enough to have been a cop at least thirteen years ago, probably eighteen. Especially since Belson was likely the more experienced officer. When Mac recognizes Belson's name and Flack says Danny rode with him, it sounded like an event that occurred recently...

I'm fairly certain he told Flack the timeframe during their conversation. And if Danny meant that Belson had been working for Le Douche six years, then no, Danny's past is not intact. Not to mention Belson didn't look old enough to have worked as a cop up to eighteen years ago.

CSI:NY math strikes again. According to "Out of the Sky", Danny rode with the disgraced Officer Belson six years ago. This is patently impossible, as Danny has been with the lab for at least seven years, and if "On the Job" is to be believed, had worked for Mac at least five years before...

Dear Flack, BAD FLACK, no biscuit! What is wrong with you, being all stupidly heroic? I'm still amazed you didn't take a few in the legs and chest. Bad, bad Flack. ~snuggles~ Dear Mac, Ahhahaha! Wrong again! And for bonus fail, you shot and killed the man who saved your life. Fail...

There was really nothing new about this week's episode of CSI:NY. The plot has been done several times before on nearly every procedural. In fact, while watching, I was often reminded of "Blink", when Mac misinterpreted an identification from a woman who had been locked in her body by a...

I enjoyed CSI:NY last night. It didn't blow my socks off, and it was badly, badly outshone by the superlative, vastly more authentic episode of Blue Bloods that followed it, but it kept me engaged and had an early-season 2 vibe. The cast has clearly been rejuvenated by the addition of Sela...