Search results

I get the feeling Nicky's given the scenes nobody else wants. Like the ass-man scene. That should probably have been Greg's because why would a CSI3 need confirmation from Keppy to run the serials on the implants? That's a CSI1 question. The entire scene scremed Greg IMHO - the kind of humor...

Continuity is the weak link of this show. Some of the character do have some continuity, like Cath and her father-issues and problems with her off-spring. Gil had his hearing problem for an entire season, and now he has shi romance. Greggo's even got contiuity with the civil suit that is...

Re: Champagne and cocoons I know 2 cases of continuity in Nick's case. 1) In Bodies in motion it happened twice - an officer asked how he was doing and DA Michaels got brushed off by Warrick for asking about him. 2) In Gum Drops, Nick himself said "I was rescued" and Sara hurried to tell him...

So now they're having Cath drool over Keppy? CSI is gonna be the soapiest thing ever before it ends. :rolleyes: Gil, Sara and Greg in an love triangle, Keppy, Cath and Warrick in the other. Oh, that's so refreshing *pukes*

LOL, these are two people, one 50 and the other well over 30 and they behave like teens, pining and writing letters? Isn't there a phone-line where Grissom went? it is just ridicuous on so many levels. Our parting was awkward? And what should be said about this letter then? :lol: Would a...

This season has beenn the absolute worst IMHO, no team interaction, until Redrum, same pairing all the time. Weak cases and too much personal drama. Yikes!

Well I don't hold Tge departed as a very realistic film, and as of lately CSI has begun to get a tad too unrealistc for me too. Which is really funny since it's supposed to be scientific. With Catherine stealing drugs, sanctioned by the undershereiff (a judge needed to ok that and mark the...

No even an undersheriff has the right to ask his employees to steal narcotics, no way. There are very strict laws and regulations about that and the stash would have been marked specifically for this operation. Not taken off another case. It simply works that way, you just don't go stealing...

If she handled narcotics without logging it and leaving a paper trail, without a doubt. Furthermore it would tarnish the labs reputation irreparably. Any DA worth their alt would ask how the evidence was retrieved and second guess them all along the way because in one instance evidence was...

She wasn't undercover, undercover operations needs clearance from the DA, which they obvisously didn't have, not to the extent that the case they fejked was even distuingishable from the real case. An undercovered operation means infiltration, not tampering with evidence. Undercover operation...

But she did! She tampered with a controlled substance and planted it as evidence on another case. The mere fact that she handled narcotics without logging the incidence is a crime. IRL she would have been fired already.

They flushed him out and then he walked. And if it weren't for Nick and Sara finding the fingerprints he would never have been indicted for anything. I'd say normal policework would have tracked him eventually. The undersheriff was jumping the gun, just as Nick pointed out and Keppy and Cath...

How exactly did it work since the case was thrown out? And again, Nick confronted Cath, and she pulled the supervisor card on him. She could have simply told him; "Please Nick, trust me on this one, I'll tell you later." And the fact that she wanted him out of the way because she knew he's pick...

That is Nick, Sara and Warrick (and Greg also since he is now a CSI too)

If your boss is about to indict a person you know is innocent, would you turn a blind eye? I know I wouldn't. It's a question of morals, and Cath has her own kind. Good thing there's someone stopping her. Yay for the young turks, I wanna see more of them. Good ep, but it would have been even...

That's probably why Nick is pissed. Cath went along with a stupid idea and Nick was the one to break the case by IDing Sara's victim as a player in the original case and putting the pieces together. What comes out after Cath royally blew the faked scene and had the D.A. dismiss it. Yup, Cath...

Exactly - and it baffles me that it allowed in certain circumstances and in others not. :D Smells a lot like double standards. I for one don't mind the GSR so much anymore - but bring Nick and Warrick out of the basement for crying in the sink!

You just killed me! *can't stop laughing*

Well I believed anybody can express their opionion here - but I stand corrected. I've read a lot about Nick I've not agreed with, but I have never resorted to ridiculing another poster because of her/his opionion. You can say what you like about Nick (or Warrick because I love him too), since...

Jeez, talking about opening a can of worms, and then the Greg-fans to ridicule an opnion? I think you and I must have wathed different versions of GD :lol: Greg worried about his clothes getting dirtied, nothing else. He always had that same dad look, he sported it all through "Post Mortem" for...