Search results

Thanks DW! Despite the episode not having Greg or Catherine in it, I'm still looking forward to it. And yeah, if I were a recurring guest on the show, I too would be concerned if my next appearance would be as a corpse. :lol:

I'm actually with you on this. Unless he himself feels the need, I don't think he needs therapy. I agree that while angry in "Target of Obsession", he seemed to be in control of himself.

In this weeks episode, watch as Shane's attempts to get more sleep causes him to develop a crippling addiction to NyQuil.

See, if they showed the "How of Haskell" episode last season or something, then I'd be interested. But now it's too much. And I'm confused as to why they're introducing the mother-in-law. Do we really need that? Does it matter?

While I'm happy that Haskell is to be "vanquished" (wow. classy), I'm a little surprised that they are releasing that information. Although I suppose it's an attempt to boost ratings for the finale by promising the death of the villain. I guess this means no Squeegel?

There was one post of hers sometime back that was hilarious. It was something like: "Working with Hodges = taxing. Working with Wally Langham = priceless." :lol: ... but now all this talk about Liz makes me sad. :(

Just wanted to post this. From Liz's twitter: Happy to see she still hangs out with the cast.

I'm just having a thought here, but what if George didn't want to be there? Perhaps it was his day off, he got invited to come by, but he had plans or something. Or maybe he just wasn't feeling well or maybe just wasn't into a party. Same thing could be asked about the others not there: Jorja...

That is an awesome looking cake. They should have made it really authentic for the show. "Mmm... tastes like death..." :lol:

Funny enough, I get that compliment a lot. :lol: And I'm actually okay with the idea of Ecklie's daughter joining the team. I agree that with the right actress it could really work. Smokey, don't worry. I usually get a little confused with all the theories too. I usually have to go back and...

Thank you for the "helpful" response. :lol: ;)

I can't recall if this was mentioned or not, but do we know which episode Sofia is returning in?

The difference here being that Greg is familiar with Heather having processed evidence for two of the cases she was involved in. This is mainly something his fans would want to see as a humorous event as well, as Greg has shown an... interest in the stuff Heather did. :lol: I'm a little unsure...

I love the idea of bringing Wendy back. At this point, I'd take back any of the former female characters: Wendy, Riley... even Mia. :lol: With Sofia making an appearance or two, I'd personally love it to be her. Not sure how that would work, what with her being a cop and all. And I know not...

He was talking about Langston, not Fishburne. Whatever... :rolleyes:

They have been building Nick up as a lead. Who knows. Maybe Ray doesn't make it to next season. Or maybe this is the last season. All the continuity this season has had: call backs to older seasons (references to Sam Braun, Warrick, etc), the return of several old characters (Grissom, Sofia)...

Wow. You've really thought about this in detail, huh? Intimate detail... :lol:

I did think about what Grissom's reaction would have been when the prison guard made the warning comment about flipping their jackets around and most of the guys being in there because of them. All I could picture was him being silent and just raising his eyebrow as though the idea intrigued...