Based on the interview with George Eads on CSI files I don't think Nick's love interest is going to take. The way he was talking it sounds like he didn't have any chemistry with the girl.... he wants Nick to go out with Finn (Elisabeth Shue's character)
I felt Catherine was being a bit petulent in this episode. There were a few thing she did that made me think she was working through her anger.
Firstly she didn't contact Nick and tell him there was a new supervisor and that he had lost his office. Someone on a work conference would be...
I think Nick has a lot to answer for. After all he and Ray ran around a fair ground with guns out without any contact with the local police. Nick was apprehended and taken into custody, and while he was release without any charges they very well could have come down on him like a tonne of...
I am assuming that the bomb expert may not necessarily work on the night shift with these guys and is being brought in as a love interest with Nick.
If the chemistry is there and the fans are OK then she will be a "recurring" character for relationship development. I could be wrong but that...
If ET didn't spend half the show repeating ad nauseum what is coming up and using the words "exclusively to ET" or "an ET exclusive" or "spoke only to ET" then they could actually fit some longer stories in.
Sorry not CSI related but had to gripe!
Being from Australia and not 100% up on US law, but if a criminal commits a crime in two states (or more) or "crosses state lines" during a criminal act, doesn't it them become a federal crime and come under the juristiction of the FBI?
I am curious as to how the writers will get around this...
Re: "For Warrick" Season Premiere Discussion *SPOILERS*
Good news for Australian viewers - just saw an ad and CSI is being fast tracked to us Monday night!!
Thank goodness we don't have to wait until February anymore :)